Sunday, January 25, 2015

7) Calvinism and Armenianism: Conclusion

               What then?  Is there any good to studying Calvinism and Armenianism?  Of course.  If we are to say that both are true, then the more we know of them, the more we know of the Truth they point to and describe parts of.  What we ought to stop doing is supposing that one is right and the other is wrong.  There is far too much merit to them both.
                I would not even say that people should stop being Calvinists and Armenianists and start being Paradoxicalists in terms of what they identify as.  Paradoxicalism has shed a new light on what it means to be a Calvinist and what it means to be an Armenianist.  Before, if you were a Calvinist, it usually meant that you thought Calvinism was the right way to think about God, and that all other ways were either dead wrong or not quite as right.  The same went for Armenianism.  But now, since we see that Paradoxicalism is true, it is not quite like that.  To be a Calvinist is now to express a preference – you identify with the side of God that is in control and that can work everything out for a reason.  You interact with God through this lens.  When you pray, you are aligning yourself to his immovable will.  When something bad happens, you know that God will be able to make something good out of it.  The same goes for Armenianism – you identify with the side of God that has given you the freedom and opportunity to reciprocate his love for you.  When you pray, you honestly plead your case to him.  When something bad happens, you know that God genuinely grieves with you.
                It is far different, in light of Paradoxicalism, to say, “I’m a Calvinist,” or, “I’m an Armenianist”.  To say, “I’m a Calvinist” simply means that you admire the Calvinist parts of God’s character, the way that you admire certain traits in your friend more than others.  To say, “I’m an Armenianist” means that you admire the Armenianist parts of God’s character.  But of course, in your admiration for one characteristic, you cannot simply deny the existence of the other characteristics.  They are still there and just as much a part of God as the other characteristics.

                Thus Calvinism and Armenianism are useful for one to find their preference, and get some clarity as to how they relate to God.  Paradoxicalism is useful in keeping the two respectful and knowledgeable of the fact that there are many genuine ways to relate to God, the way that there are many genuine ways to relate to a friend.  It also reminds us of the ultimate depth and inscrutability of God’s character.

No comments:

Post a Comment